The new jury verdict followed a trial in San Jose, California, before Judge Lucy Koh that focused on how much Samsung should pay for infringing Apple patents covering aspects of the iPhone's design. It is not clear yet whether that indicates future plans to appeal. The jury had to decide if Samsung should have to pay damages based on sales of its smartphones or just their components that infringed the patents. A little over a year later, a jury awarded more than $1 billion to Apple, paving the way for years of legal hassle.
The retrial has been looming since December 2016, when the U.S. Supreme Court returned the case to a lower federal court for a jury to determine whether the entire phone or its components were the correct "article of manufacture".
This particular case over design patents has been dragging on since 2011.
"Now, they have a road map to winning full damages again", he said.
Juror says she didn't think about the financials or about punishing Samsung and they all agreed pretty quickly that the d'305 covered the whole phone bc can't see the design without the phone. This lawsuit started back in 2012 when Apple sued Samsung for patent infringement.
Facebook, Twitter Crack Down on Political Ads
Separately Twitter has announced new labels for candidates running in 2018 US midterm general election. They also promise to hire 3,000 to 4,000 new employees to help personally vet these ads.
Boris Johnson spends 18 minutes on the phone with Russia prank caller
A prank call to Boris Johnson has triggered a diplomatic row after the Kremlin was accused of being behind the "desperate" stunt. The call ended abruptly after the prankster described a new kind of poison and suggested that Johnson should try it.
Some US websites are blocked in the European Union as GDPR day arrives
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) changes the way companies around the world collect and handle personal data. Not everyone is willing to wait for Jelinek and regulators to flex their new powers.
Apple welcomed the jury's decision, saying: "Samsung should pay for copying our products".
Noreen Krall, Apple's longtime chief of litigation and omnipresent field marshal in the litigation over smartphone technology, has traveled widely to implement Jobs's wish. Samsung, of course, appealed the amount of the damages and had the number reduced to $339 million.
As expected, Samsung's lawyer said that the verdict isn't based on evidence so the Korean giant will raise its objections.
The bulk of the damages, $533,316,606, was awarded for the infringement of three design patents, including the infamous "rounded corners" patent.
In a moment that made us shudder, in a 'why, why won't this end?' kind of way, Apple has been awarded significant damages in its patent dispute with Samsung, amounting to $539m (around £400m / AU$700).